农夫导航

No NOAA Large-Disaster Data to Hurt Insurers’ Grasp of Secondary Perils, Says AM Best

By | May 20, 2025

农夫导航 industry financial strength rating agency AM Best said today that a decision to stop updating a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration disaster database could be detrimental to insurers and may require the rethinking of some products.

About two weeks ago NOAA announced it will of climate and weather disasters that caused at least $1 billion in damage, “with no updates beyond calendar year 2024.” Past reports from 1980-2024 will be archived.

AM Best said the move could affect insurers’ ability to track losses from so-called secondary perils such as wildfires, floods, and severe convective storms. This group of perils is an increasing cause of catastrophe losses, especially in North America.

“Having a common and agreed-upon data source would help insurers trend these losses in their modeling and use the data for pricing, reinsurance and risk management, as well as help assess the gap between insured losses and economic losses and see how insurance can work to minimize the gap,” said Sridhar Manyem, AM Best’s senior director, industry research and analytics, in a statement.

Related: Insured Losses Could Hit $145B in 2025, Driven by Rising Claims From Secondary Perils

AM Best pointed out that the end of the service by NOAA comes following a year of 27 weather events with at least $1 billion in damages. Manyem said if more databases disappeared, “parametric triggers within catastrophe bonds, which depend on measurement by NOAA, may need to be redesigned.”

“While some other countries have governmental agencies that track similar data, private companies may have to step in to fill the void and it could take some years to build credibility and trust among market participants,” he added.

Photo: Generated with AI, AdobeStock

Topics Carriers Data Driven AM Best Aerospace

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • May 23, 2025 at 1:59 pm
    Journalism works says:
    Actually you are wrong. Journalism did exactly what it is supposed to here as it warned of possible repercussions of an action taken by our government. How is that fiction? ... read more
  • May 21, 2025 at 8:41 am
    Barking neighbors dog says:
    Someone above missed the key phrases in the opening paragraph: "COULD be detrimental" and "MAY require". Let's talk again after more experience is gathered. Journalism: it's n... read more
  • May 20, 2025 at 1:45 pm
    John Dough says:
    Make Weather Great Again!

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features